Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-17 01:33:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F829060B6A60770CF234412E5A1AC5D1AE0EC5DDF0819B75040569CE6D44A05C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The OP claim of the ruling is incorrect. The OP source clearly says Justice Nieckarz ruled that “It is reasonable to conclude that the suggestion that … drag performers are ‘groomers’, merely because of their sexual or performance identity, is defamatory.” https://thecountersignal.com/breaking-calling-drag-queens-groomers-not-protected-speech/
All Note Details