Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-12-16 19:14:05 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 98168C5583489C7EF270FCCEB5D43C7317452FE7FA872C4F642D006E1D12783E
Participant Details
Original Note:
The OP claim of the ruling is incorrect. The OP source clearly says Justice Nieckarz ruled that “It is reasonable to conclude that the suggestion that … drag performers are ‘groomers’, merely because of their sexual or performance identity, is defamatory.” https://thecountersignal.com/breaking-calling-drag-queens-groomers-not-protected-speech/
All Note Details