Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-16 19:14:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98168C5583489C7EF270FCCEB5D43C7317452FE7FA872C4F642D006E1D12783E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP claim of the ruling is incorrect. The OP source clearly says Justice Nieckarz ruled that “It is reasonable to conclude that the suggestion that … drag performers are ‘groomers’, merely because of their sexual or performance identity, is defamatory.” https://thecountersignal.com/breaking-calling-drag-queens-groomers-not-protected-speech/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735910074638573888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98168C5583489C7EF270FCCEB5D43C7317452FE7FA872C4F642D006E1D12783E
  • createdAtMillis - 1702754045319
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173591007463857388898168C5583489C7EF270FCCEB5D43C7317452FE7FA872C4F642D006E1D12783E