Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-16 10:47:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DFDD545C4F2E93E985DCEDB6B649965F1C67FE89701281844F66368706DBD59
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 2nd tweet in the original thread includes the NY Times headline calling it a 'landmark case'. Many of the tabloid articles Prince Harry submitted were legally found to be based on info drawn from phone hacking. The rest is opinion. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/15/world/europe/prince-harry-tabloid-hacking-lawsuit-ruling.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735892241942769821
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DFDD545C4F2E93E985DCEDB6B649965F1C67FE89701281844F66368706DBD59
  • createdAtMillis - 1702723671103
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17358922419427698214DFDD545C4F2E93E985DCEDB6B649965F1C67FE89701281844F66368706DBD59