Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-16 23:10:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 636D0DFFF9AF168C6104F22D98873B4630272FB4991FD244F0488DD0F60C3F68
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. While it does appear to be digitally altered, the post makes no claims of authenticity; simply stating that they found it interesting. While it is likely engagement bait, OP could be stating the digital alterations themselves are interesting. The is simply no context.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735639602180870170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 636D0DFFF9AF168C6104F22D98873B4630272FB4991FD244F0488DD0F60C3F68
  • createdAtMillis - 1702768235202
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1735639602180870170636D0DFFF9AF168C6104F22D98873B4630272FB4991FD244F0488DD0F60C3F68