Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-13 06:07:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CB05124E332086D5CF820F89827AC59295CEAE77CD15C08F842CE8D5E3D1AE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study does not contradict WSJs article. As stated in this study, “these figures represent only a partial account and do not reflect the full extent”. It only consists of “publicly available information, including social media posts from family members, local media coverage“ https://en.zona.media/article/2022/05/20/casualties_eng

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735631947135647744
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CB05124E332086D5CF820F89827AC59295CEAE77CD15C08F842CE8D5E3D1AE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1723529248697
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17356319471356477444CB05124E332086D5CF820F89827AC59295CEAE77CD15C08F842CE8D5E3D1AE5