Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-16 06:10:11 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0CC896F851051A976DB0AE9F1AAE2DC49ACDA5921246E47CA667A3754B029DA4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study does not contradict WSJs article. As stated in this study, “these figures represent only a partial account and do not reflect the full extent”. It only consists of “publicly available information, including social media posts from family members, local media coverage“ https://en.zona.media/article/2022/05/20/casualties_eng

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735631947135647744
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0CC896F851051A976DB0AE9F1AAE2DC49ACDA5921246E47CA667A3754B029DA4
  • createdAtMillis - 1702707011719
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17356319471356477440CC896F851051A976DB0AE9F1AAE2DC49ACDA5921246E47CA667A3754B029DA4