Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-15 09:59:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E74028EDC088B5DB5A63CE3617C38865AE2100DCCD52DBE8F064BEDAF817078F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. How the organizers of the ceremony officially justified its aesthetics at the time is irrelevant to the post and does not disprove the conspiracy hinted at by this tweet. The post is therefore not misleading and further discussion belongs in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735582835375841628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E74028EDC088B5DB5A63CE3617C38865AE2100DCCD52DBE8F064BEDAF817078F
  • createdAtMillis - 1702634367580
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1735582835375841628E74028EDC088B5DB5A63CE3617C38865AE2100DCCD52DBE8F064BEDAF817078F