Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-15 12:37:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B78EA1D4A4E24E5780C5F97415D4A98BB3918A4E35E89BCE3706454975A4EEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. How the organizers of the ceremony officially justified its aesthetics at the time is irrelevant to the post and does not disprove the conspiracy hinted at by this tweet. The post is therefore not misleading and further discussion belongs in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735582835375841628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B78EA1D4A4E24E5780C5F97415D4A98BB3918A4E35E89BCE3706454975A4EEE
  • createdAtMillis - 1702643820081
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17355828353758416288B78EA1D4A4E24E5780C5F97415D4A98BB3918A4E35E89BCE3706454975A4EEE