Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-15 12:22:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 24FBBD6AE9E9AC1491335F8DBEFE86F3D9EC0136D220A2551FA2794D4F065CCE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. How the organizers of the ceremony officially justified its aesthetics at the time is irrelevant to the post and does not disprove the conspiracy hinted at by this tweet. The post is therefore not misleading and further discussion belongs in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735582835375841628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 24FBBD6AE9E9AC1491335F8DBEFE86F3D9EC0136D220A2551FA2794D4F065CCE
  • createdAtMillis - 1702642954424
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173558283537584162824FBBD6AE9E9AC1491335F8DBEFE86F3D9EC0136D220A2551FA2794D4F065CCE