Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-15 09:40:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C321F5AA94382A522E0C2D3A55392D3209DBDCEA3C399A533A20A5604088639
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. How the organizers of the ceremony officially justified its aesthetics at the time is irrelevant to the post and does not disprove the conspiracy hinted at by this tweet. The post is therefore not misleading and further discussion belongs in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735582835375841628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C321F5AA94382A522E0C2D3A55392D3209DBDCEA3C399A533A20A5604088639
  • createdAtMillis - 1702633239928
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17355828353758416281C321F5AA94382A522E0C2D3A55392D3209DBDCEA3C399A533A20A5604088639