Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-14 22:57:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5EB53174E2CC3C901C61C8CDD412B7982988A1BDBF7197EF9119BA7DBC71B07
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a selective edit of their exchange. A fuller version is here: https://x.com/simonjedge/status/1735058960544158072?s=46 X users have documented at least 17 occasions when Kate Osborne has herself used the term “epidemic” in a non-medical context. https://x.com/robbietravers/status/1735014755532751318?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735432528352379044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5EB53174E2CC3C901C61C8CDD412B7982988A1BDBF7197EF9119BA7DBC71B07
  • createdAtMillis - 1702594628523
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1735432528352379044B5EB53174E2CC3C901C61C8CDD412B7982988A1BDBF7197EF9119BA7DBC71B07