Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-16 07:33:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61A969F941D134AC87666E580DCF9BE5825210DF33B8E3899FFC1E0AEA1AEAC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a selective edit of their exchange. A fuller version is here: https://x.com/simonjedge/status/1735058960544158072?s=46 X users have documented at least 17 occasions when Kate Osborne has herself used the term “epidemic” in a non-medical context. https://x.com/robbietravers/status/1735014755532751318?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1735432528352379044
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61A969F941D134AC87666E580DCF9BE5825210DF33B8E3899FFC1E0AEA1AEAC6
  • createdAtMillis - 1702711995255
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173543252835237904461A969F941D134AC87666E580DCF9BE5825210DF33B8E3899FFC1E0AEA1AEAC6