Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-14 08:04:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 589D153833AFBA23C2F526B7E1C0AE663289C2BAA59BEC75D725CF65BDBC441C
Participant Details

Original Note:

One of the presenting organizations withdrew and the event was changed but the award is still being given. LitHub acknowledged that in a "clarification" at the bottom of the article in this post https://t.co/86LIgfrekr based on reporting by Die Zeit https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2023-12/deutsch-israelische-gesellschaft-masha-gessen-kritik-hannah-arendt-preis

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1735170041404867022
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 589D153833AFBA23C2F526B7E1C0AE663289C2BAA59BEC75D725CF65BDBC441C
createdAtMillis - 1702541047168
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1735170041404867022589D153833AFBA23C2F526B7E1C0AE663289C2BAA59BEC75D725CF65BDBC441C