Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 16:21:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D459E16F1162A09B4C55C936CCDAF628CB1B30913648E3E33B863A632BBD6B14
Participant Details

Original Note:

The wording in the headline (and David's tweet) is misleading. What's been reversed is FDA's right to issue medical advice. The court didn't rule on "The Case Against Ivermectin to Prevent and Treat COVID-19", i.e. on whether ivermectin is effective or safe. https://www.courthousenews.com/fifth-circuit-sides-with-ivermectin-prescribing-doctors-in-their-quarrel-with-the-fda/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734851548314808487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D459E16F1162A09B4C55C936CCDAF628CB1B30913648E3E33B863A632BBD6B14
  • createdAtMillis - 1704471703161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734851548314808487D459E16F1162A09B4C55C936CCDAF628CB1B30913648E3E33B863A632BBD6B14