Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-13 20:41:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40056426A7B4E8BA6C9B61C3AFD73229F0E406ADC89A1F306697DF9541EE7843
Participant Details

Original Note:

The wording in the headline (and David's tweet) is misleading. What's been reversed is FDA's right to issue medical advice. The court didn't rule on "The Case Against Ivermectin to Prevent and Treat COVID-19", i.e. on whether ivermectin is effective or safe. https://www.courthousenews.com/fifth-circuit-sides-with-ivermectin-prescribing-doctors-in-their-quarrel-with-the-fda/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734851548314808487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40056426A7B4E8BA6C9B61C3AFD73229F0E406ADC89A1F306697DF9541EE7843
  • createdAtMillis - 1702500110910
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 173485154831480848740056426A7B4E8BA6C9B61C3AFD73229F0E406ADC89A1F306697DF9541EE7843