Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-13 05:07:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33243D734D2EFC50A664AB8EFE4387E836F29E5EF3BE6263222B3F821CF0F120
Participant Details

Original Note:

Yet again, No they didn’t. While Sid continues to falsify this, remember he is doing it as the first post went viral. He is attempting to regain popularity, and thus, gain monetary benefits. In case it isn’t clear it is a joke, the poster earlier clarifies this is a joke. https://x.com/immasiddtweets/status/1732813492972102014?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734720031383237008
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33243D734D2EFC50A664AB8EFE4387E836F29E5EF3BE6263222B3F821CF0F120
  • createdAtMillis - 1702444027991
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173472003138323700833243D734D2EFC50A664AB8EFE4387E836F29E5EF3BE6263222B3F821CF0F120