Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 20:12:29 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EBD44F14933A5A0590EF5F43C3565F14D69FD3AA55078ABC59002D496ACDE96
Participant Details

Original Note:

This preprint was retracted because the study's conclusions were not supported by the study methodology. No Inclusion/exclusion criteria was provided for the study. No control group. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734654992823280106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EBD44F14933A5A0590EF5F43C3565F14D69FD3AA55078ABC59002D496ACDE96
  • createdAtMillis - 1702411949006
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17346549928232801065EBD44F14933A5A0590EF5F43C3565F14D69FD3AA55078ABC59002D496ACDE96