Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 15:05:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4B7D69646A9F37921139DEAD0E1C09171E66ADC136BD0BE7A8211DAB49DD230
Participant Details

Original Note:

What the author of this tweet fails to understand is that a doctoral dissertation is based on a research question. To explain why the research question is relevant, a case must be made through a “literature review.” The lit review section is an analysis of PREVIOUS research. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1219&context=pare

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734428984342093865
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4B7D69646A9F37921139DEAD0E1C09171E66ADC136BD0BE7A8211DAB49DD230
  • createdAtMillis - 1702393503403
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734428984342093865D4B7D69646A9F37921139DEAD0E1C09171E66ADC136BD0BE7A8211DAB49DD230