Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-05 22:35:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04C2B45565B68B78E6ED11C10C3C25DC876361EFF20D1F229F73387849E9A572
Participant Details

Original Note:

What the author of this tweet fails to understand is that a doctoral dissertation is based on a research question. To explain why the research question is relevant, a case must be made through a “literature review.” The lit review section is an analysis of PREVIOUS research. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1219&context=pare

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734428984342093865
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04C2B45565B68B78E6ED11C10C3C25DC876361EFF20D1F229F73387849E9A572
  • createdAtMillis - 1704494107174
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 173442898434209386504C2B45565B68B78E6ED11C10C3C25DC876361EFF20D1F229F73387849E9A572