Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 05:57:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF046B692456354E599C7CCD413CB524A68B12752F3D7E5858FE5FAD27B7F247
Participant Details

Original Note:

As repugnant as one may find the opinion in this post, it's an opinion. Speculating on the intactness of the author's socks isn't a proper use of Community Notes. And the racial slur in the other proposed note is beyond the pale and should disqualify its author from writing CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734398945713860850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF046B692456354E599C7CCD413CB524A68B12752F3D7E5858FE5FAD27B7F247
  • createdAtMillis - 1702360625715
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734398945713860850BF046B692456354E599C7CCD413CB524A68B12752F3D7E5858FE5FAD27B7F247