Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 04:06:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9244F52FC8750305DB842D651B6C181253D2B903C830CCEE860ADFB014D98D52
Participant Details

Original Note:

As repugnant as one may find the opinion in this post, it's an opinion. Speculating on the intactness of the author's socks isn't a proper use of Community Notes. And the racial slur in the other proposed note is beyond the pale and should disqualify its author from writing CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734398945713860850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9244F52FC8750305DB842D651B6C181253D2B903C830CCEE860ADFB014D98D52
  • createdAtMillis - 1702353990003
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17343989457138608509244F52FC8750305DB842D651B6C181253D2B903C830CCEE860ADFB014D98D52