Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 08:54:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87D3358C27E8A06E643DCA7897325B3735E72F6266B92D3860D626ED2710DDFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

As repugnant as one may find the opinion in this post, it's an opinion. Speculating on the intactness of the author's socks isn't a proper use of Community Notes. And the racial slur in the other proposed note is beyond the pale and should disqualify its author from writing CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734398945713860850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87D3358C27E8A06E643DCA7897325B3735E72F6266B92D3860D626ED2710DDFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1702371271617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173439894571386085087D3358C27E8A06E643DCA7897325B3735E72F6266B92D3860D626ED2710DDFB