Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 17:03:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 859A4CA013F9F94F1C934BA44EA5394E9CE522309B935D2A575F1DC923CFEF16
Participant Details

Original Note:

As repugnant as one may find the opinion in this post, it's an opinion. Speculating on the intactness of the author's socks isn't a proper use of Community Notes. And the racial slur in the other proposed note is beyond the pale and should disqualify its author from writing CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734398945713860850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 859A4CA013F9F94F1C934BA44EA5394E9CE522309B935D2A575F1DC923CFEF16
  • createdAtMillis - 1702400592191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734398945713860850859A4CA013F9F94F1C934BA44EA5394E9CE522309B935D2A575F1DC923CFEF16