Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 22:59:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 27C0675E6F4F28C8AFE0B80D5701E194AE1A7223F283C2CC9CBC4AA6413DB0CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

As repugnant as one may find the opinion in this post, it's an opinion. Speculating on the intactness of the author's socks isn't a proper use of Community Notes. And the racial slur in the other proposed note is beyond the pale and should disqualify its author from writing CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734398945713860850
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 27C0675E6F4F28C8AFE0B80D5701E194AE1A7223F283C2CC9CBC4AA6413DB0CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1702421946672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173439894571386085027C0675E6F4F28C8AFE0B80D5701E194AE1A7223F283C2CC9CBC4AA6413DB0CC