Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 04:29:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EA4B0E940534CB6138FA8246E9DA10DEFDB981866B5B1C4BE430178D752C5EBA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article in the proposed note above does not support the presented claim of material forensic evidence. The linked BBC article never even mentions the word "forensic", and the only reference to "injury" was a random eyewitness' testimony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734304708192252363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EA4B0E940534CB6138FA8246E9DA10DEFDB981866B5B1C4BE430178D752C5EBA
  • createdAtMillis - 1714537796749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734304708192252363EA4B0E940534CB6138FA8246E9DA10DEFDB981866B5B1C4BE430178D752C5EBA