Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 22:08:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ABE4A8848B736C6886715B2894D5A88ABDC8F2680C3AF8340EA15A171371D62B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article in the proposed note above does not support the presented claim of material forensic evidence. The linked BBC article never even mentions the word "forensic", and the only reference to "injury" was a random eyewitness' testimony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734304708192252363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ABE4A8848B736C6886715B2894D5A88ABDC8F2680C3AF8340EA15A171371D62B
  • createdAtMillis - 1702332519522
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734304708192252363ABE4A8848B736C6886715B2894D5A88ABDC8F2680C3AF8340EA15A171371D62B