Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 07:02:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64AD75C712245255900A09173D58E94FC01EB595E3BC09F9BD5BA3FD49ECEEC1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article in the proposed note above does not support the presented claim of material forensic evidence. The linked BBC article never even mentions the word "forensic", and the only reference to "injury" was a random eyewitness' testimony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734304708192252363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64AD75C712245255900A09173D58E94FC01EB595E3BC09F9BD5BA3FD49ECEEC1
  • createdAtMillis - 1702364550536
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173430470819225236364AD75C712245255900A09173D58E94FC01EB595E3BC09F9BD5BA3FD49ECEEC1