Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 00:06:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4F5B35CBCCA4ED486BDADBED3910E180F1D8729004356FEE4BF2E1751B5DBB05
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article in the proposed note above does not support the presented claim of material forensic evidence. The linked BBC article never even mentions the word "forensic", and the only reference to "injury" was a random eyewitness' testimony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734304708192252363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4F5B35CBCCA4ED486BDADBED3910E180F1D8729004356FEE4BF2E1751B5DBB05
  • createdAtMillis - 1702339585240
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17343047081922523634F5B35CBCCA4ED486BDADBED3910E180F1D8729004356FEE4BF2E1751B5DBB05