Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 14:41:44 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 424D34EEB8162D46DB83905D7B2D23DAA4EBC4EF0447F18A50FCAAFBD7FE904D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The article in the proposed note above does not support the presented claim of material forensic evidence. The linked BBC article never even mentions the word "forensic", and the only reference to "injury" was a random eyewitness' testimony.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734304708192252363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 424D34EEB8162D46DB83905D7B2D23DAA4EBC4EF0447F18A50FCAAFBD7FE904D
  • createdAtMillis - 1702392104597
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734304708192252363424D34EEB8162D46DB83905D7B2D23DAA4EBC4EF0447F18A50FCAAFBD7FE904D