Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 20:54:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E86CD9009C72C7A26C33F9F07835DEF2952B17174EC161125623B23FB1E1A0A
Participant Details

Original Note:

To the other NNN. Wikipedia is a more reliable source than the Daily Mail. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/08/wikipedia-bans-daily-mail-as-unreliable-source-for-website

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734292585621934508
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E86CD9009C72C7A26C33F9F07835DEF2952B17174EC161125623B23FB1E1A0A
  • createdAtMillis - 1702328080318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17342925856219345085E86CD9009C72C7A26C33F9F07835DEF2952B17174EC161125623B23FB1E1A0A