Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 19:29:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5323A385BCB5AECC8A76EE851A2CF9F645C386E36E6655E922F541466811963D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Maître Fabrice Di Vizio omet ici que la laïcité n'interdit en aucun cas l'expression publique au motif qu'elle serait religieuse. Interdire une telle manifestation serait au contraire une violation de la loi de 1905. https://mobile.interieur.gouv.fr/Publications/Cultes-et-laicite

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734255359340999071
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5323A385BCB5AECC8A76EE851A2CF9F645C386E36E6655E922F541466811963D
  • createdAtMillis - 1702322965895
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17342553593409990715323A385BCB5AECC8A76EE851A2CF9F645C386E36E6655E922F541466811963D