Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 13:31:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9FB04979552B031F37F8665DFE2BEB62EF2405EC524F65196F6BE4C9B4D7DFCC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Suggested note has a link that clearly states "you must give credit to the author of the source material, either **by placing the source material in quotation marks and providing a clear citation**, or by paraphrasing the source material and providing a clear citation." https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1734177530792354054
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9FB04979552B031F37F8665DFE2BEB62EF2405EC524F65196F6BE4C9B4D7DFCC
createdAtMillis - 1702387884279
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17341775307923540549FB04979552B031F37F8665DFE2BEB62EF2405EC524F65196F6BE4C9B4D7DFCC