Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-13 13:48:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7F99820E75E4B7A3AC8213D4852E7247F3C7B3D208E4C3B488F24A34C106191
Participant Details

Original Note:

Even though the main subject is the same, the great review did not use information from Jacob Geller's video and did all its own research (interviews, reading a 1800-page archive, etc.). The 2 videos cover the subject in completely different ways. https://twitter.com/TheGreatReview_/status/1733827509274190136

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1734170329021370678
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A7F99820E75E4B7A3AC8213D4852E7247F3C7B3D208E4C3B488F24A34C106191
createdAtMillis - 1702475317269
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1734170329021370678A7F99820E75E4B7A3AC8213D4852E7247F3C7B3D208E4C3B488F24A34C106191