Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-13 13:22:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A54312F01CA5A082F6DA7F4C7C6439963E86BC217CA3EBB3FA7F7EEF5CB0153
Participant Details

Original Note:

Even though the main subject is the same, the great review did not use information from Jacob Geller's video and did all its own research (interviews, reading a 1800-page archive, etc.). The 2 videos cover the subject in completely different ways. https://twitter.com/TheGreatReview_/status/1733827509274190136

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1734170329021370678
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8A54312F01CA5A082F6DA7F4C7C6439963E86BC217CA3EBB3FA7F7EEF5CB0153
createdAtMillis - 1702473731510
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17341703290213706788A54312F01CA5A082F6DA7F4C7C6439963E86BC217CA3EBB3FA7F7EEF5CB0153