Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-14 22:17:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE61DA957BF81D920445DEF741517B26020F196A47075C8066D7BBE762E558E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN are designed so that they can't be "gamed", as they require agreement from contributors of differing perspectives. The entire algorithm and data is open source, and can be reviewed by anyone: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734162482040635820
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE61DA957BF81D920445DEF741517B26020F196A47075C8066D7BBE762E558E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1705270631360
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734162482040635820CE61DA957BF81D920445DEF741517B26020F196A47075C8066D7BBE762E558E4