Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 13:42:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9812794613B0F9B6EEB046B391E5DF407AB66127AE6999A8393009C2B5A4D4A9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Some claims are convincing (Swain/Pitkin, King) and others less so. On the former, Gay appears not to attribute her sources, which has never been allowed. Others she cites without quotation marks-perhaps not explicit in 1997. Certainly worthy of investigation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734147684104061015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9812794613B0F9B6EEB046B391E5DF407AB66127AE6999A8393009C2B5A4D4A9
  • createdAtMillis - 1702302140576
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17341476841040610159812794613B0F9B6EEB046B391E5DF407AB66127AE6999A8393009C2B5A4D4A9