Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 13:03:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A95D836FC32DE102D3436230B2CDF3F796C895C2EF2FF7BF00CE5024AAA6BBCA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note says the "tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies." It is not an incorrect reading. The sweet's quote is identical to the beginning of the "Inadequate Paraphrase" section of Harvard's plagiarism policy, (to which the CN contributor's links): https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734082469555470550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A95D836FC32DE102D3436230B2CDF3F796C895C2EF2FF7BF00CE5024AAA6BBCA
  • createdAtMillis - 1702299821217
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734082469555470550A95D836FC32DE102D3436230B2CDF3F796C895C2EF2FF7BF00CE5024AAA6BBCA