Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 18:22:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80DC69E2B4C6CCAA705FC4346388F7CF429D150FB0E8DA866EF78511664D5580
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note says the "tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies." It is not an incorrect reading. The sweet's quote is identical to the beginning of the "Inadequate Paraphrase" section of Harvard's plagiarism policy, (to which the CN contributor's links): https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734082469555470550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80DC69E2B4C6CCAA705FC4346388F7CF429D150FB0E8DA866EF78511664D5580
  • createdAtMillis - 1702318923910
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173408246955547055080DC69E2B4C6CCAA705FC4346388F7CF429D150FB0E8DA866EF78511664D5580