Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 16:19:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3AF13713F4700D19592C6FE4805A5946648360211C57D5C494E76875840F2197
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note says the "tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies." It is not an incorrect reading. The sweet's quote is identical to the beginning of the "Inadequate Paraphrase" section of Harvard's plagiarism policy, (to which the CN contributor's links): https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734082469555470550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3AF13713F4700D19592C6FE4805A5946648360211C57D5C494E76875840F2197
  • createdAtMillis - 1702311578440
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17340824695554705503AF13713F4700D19592C6FE4805A5946648360211C57D5C494E76875840F2197