Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 07:14:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B283481E429957331960002161F55144B4A250F1B380011977C7A1FAEA4F766
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note says the "tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies." It is not an incorrect reading. The sweet's quote is identical to the beginning of the "Inadequate Paraphrase" section of Harvard's plagiarism policy, (to which the CN contributor's links): https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734082469555470550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B283481E429957331960002161F55144B4A250F1B380011977C7A1FAEA4F766
  • createdAtMillis - 1702278865490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17340824695554705501B283481E429957331960002161F55144B4A250F1B380011977C7A1FAEA4F766