Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 04:21:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F49161B1E6688427A427CDADFD2FF4636CC4B51360D41E0A1C2AAD54A0064EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note says the "tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies." It is not an incorrect reading. The sweet's quote is identical to the beginning of the "Inadequate Paraphrase" section of Harvard's plagiarism policy, (to which the CN contributor's links): https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734082469555470550
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F49161B1E6688427A427CDADFD2FF4636CC4B51360D41E0A1C2AAD54A0064EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1702354885412
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17340824695554705500F49161B1E6688427A427CDADFD2FF4636CC4B51360D41E0A1C2AAD54A0064EB