Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 04:44:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48057404BC538DBD056EFE4D53DC43E27F5149B26F23E31C222116642784CEE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

With today's tech one could run her paper through a source which could either prove or disprove plagiarism https://www.scribbr.com/plagiarism-checker/?scr_source=knowledgebase&scr_medium=sidebar&scr_campaign=minimalistic-sidebar

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734071219408785775
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48057404BC538DBD056EFE4D53DC43E27F5149B26F23E31C222116642784CEE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1702269895733
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 173407121940878577548057404BC538DBD056EFE4D53DC43E27F5149B26F23E31C222116642784CEE5