Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 12:55:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0A28B51B385DFD4F7E3A9F136E3A4EB0ABEBDA0B6CED9C47D045FB12EC8EC72
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies. (https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0) Gay leaves no doubt, in the two sentences, that the ideas come from Bobo and Gillam. This is acceptable under the Harvard plagiarism policy for both verbatim and mosaic plagiarism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734066517166481876
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0A28B51B385DFD4F7E3A9F136E3A4EB0ABEBDA0B6CED9C47D045FB12EC8EC72
  • createdAtMillis - 1702385735834
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734066517166481876D0A28B51B385DFD4F7E3A9F136E3A4EB0ABEBDA0B6CED9C47D045FB12EC8EC72