Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 06:02:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C167377E4EF9E22D8C62D275C8DD1B30E58DE43234F4E99FD36FCC085668FEF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies. (https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0) Gay leaves no doubt, in the two sentences, that the ideas come from Bobo and Gillam. This is acceptable under the Harvard plagiarism policy for both verbatim and mosaic plagiarism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734066517166481876
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C167377E4EF9E22D8C62D275C8DD1B30E58DE43234F4E99FD36FCC085668FEF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1702274538687
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1734066517166481876C167377E4EF9E22D8C62D275C8DD1B30E58DE43234F4E99FD36FCC085668FEF1