Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 10:39:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A68902B1E2E5CB84AE8859B6786A941646D6B2BF05165A4FB916ACB651AFC2BF
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies. (https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0) Gay leaves no doubt, in the two sentences, that the ideas come from Bobo and Gillam. This is acceptable under the Harvard plagiarism policy for both verbatim and mosaic plagiarism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734066517166481876
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A68902B1E2E5CB84AE8859B6786A941646D6B2BF05165A4FB916ACB651AFC2BF
  • createdAtMillis - 1702291184487
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1734066517166481876A68902B1E2E5CB84AE8859B6786A941646D6B2BF05165A4FB916ACB651AFC2BF