Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 06:51:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98DDA29E9E65E6BB77C3DFC8C929F41AE51591470940B0CE9AAECD60167B4FFE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies. (https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0) Gay leaves no doubt, in the two sentences, that the ideas come from Bobo and Gillam. This is acceptable under the Harvard plagiarism policy for both verbatim and mosaic plagiarism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734066517166481876
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98DDA29E9E65E6BB77C3DFC8C929F41AE51591470940B0CE9AAECD60167B4FFE
  • createdAtMillis - 1702277502504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173406651716648187698DDA29E9E65E6BB77C3DFC8C929F41AE51591470940B0CE9AAECD60167B4FFE