Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-12 04:20:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F49161B1E6688427A427CDADFD2FF4636CC4B51360D41E0A1C2AAD54A0064EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an incorrect reading of the Harvard policies. (https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0) Gay leaves no doubt, in the two sentences, that the ideas come from Bobo and Gillam. This is acceptable under the Harvard plagiarism policy for both verbatim and mosaic plagiarism.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734066517166481876
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F49161B1E6688427A427CDADFD2FF4636CC4B51360D41E0A1C2AAD54A0064EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1702354854109
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17340665171664818760F49161B1E6688427A427CDADFD2FF4636CC4B51360D41E0A1C2AAD54A0064EB