Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 11:18:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2A5DF51B3C578C0F17CA963EA7A1655CA02C6895EF276324E947DEC367AD1EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There is nothing factually wrong about the statement - the author is simply stating that they are breaking a story. Arguments about Harvard plagiarism policy, and what does or does not constitute plagiarism belong in the comments section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734059260483616909
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2A5DF51B3C578C0F17CA963EA7A1655CA02C6895EF276324E947DEC367AD1EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1702293537426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734059260483616909F2A5DF51B3C578C0F17CA963EA7A1655CA02C6895EF276324E947DEC367AD1EC