Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 04:15:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7B2B0471E73E2FE17134264D5F53DAE5C7DC0F3D3A9D41D812E6807B5483638
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - There is nothing factually wrong about the statement - the author is simply stating that they are breaking a story. Arguments about Harvard plagiarism policy, and what does or does not constitute plagiarism belong in the comments section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734059260483616909
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7B2B0471E73E2FE17134264D5F53DAE5C7DC0F3D3A9D41D812E6807B5483638
  • createdAtMillis - 1702268118443
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734059260483616909D7B2B0471E73E2FE17134264D5F53DAE5C7DC0F3D3A9D41D812E6807B5483638