Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 03:14:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 89B613DB5EA2E1D38A77D0AC8D9D92FC9ADCBC51C50A2F1670065B01BF392A2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the proposed CN doesn't disagree with the claim made. It merely phrases it in a way to emphasize a different viewpoint. Arguing viewpoints is for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734033478373761249
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 89B613DB5EA2E1D38A77D0AC8D9D92FC9ADCBC51C50A2F1670065B01BF392A2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1702264478976
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173403347837376124989B613DB5EA2E1D38A77D0AC8D9D92FC9ADCBC51C50A2F1670065B01BF392A2B